View Full Version : V6 and V8 TQ curves
bulldog
08-02-2006, 11:23 PM
Thought you guys migh find it interesting to see the TQ curves of the engines. Unfortunately I have not been able to track down the V8 VVTi's curves yet. If anybpdy has it please post up or send it to me.
V6
http://www.toyota120.com/GenDocs/V6%20TQ%20curve.jpg
Non VVTi V8 (03-04 models)
http://www.toyota120.com/GenDocs/V8NonVVtiTQcurve.jpg
Mikestang
08-02-2006, 11:40 PM
There's something inherently wrong with both those graphs... you couldn't measure HP and torque at low rpms & full throttle while in 4th gear (man.) or 5th gear (auto). They must be extrapolated down below like 3k. Cool none-the-less.
Bluto
08-03-2006, 08:16 AM
For the 05 Tundra. Shouldn't the TQ and HP cross at 5250 rpm? I think Toyota plots the graphs to look nice.
Mikestang
08-03-2006, 09:03 AM
What's special about 5250 rpms?
Bluto
08-03-2006, 09:24 AM
(Torque x Engine speed) / 5,252 = Horsepower
If you expand and align the torque values and plot to match the HP, the two plots should cross at 5252.
bulldog
08-03-2006, 11:41 AM
There's something inherently wrong with both those graphs... you couldn't measure HP and torque at low rpms & full throttle while in 4th gear (man.) or 5th gear (auto). They must be extrapolated down below like 3k. Cool none-the-less.
These are measured at the enigine directly, not a chassis dynometer. The most accurate way to determine what the engine gives you. With chasis dynos it is virtually impossible to get accurate readings for the low end.
bulldog
08-03-2006, 11:43 AM
For the 05 Tundra. Shouldn't the TQ and HP cross at 5250 rpm? I think Toyota plots the graphs to look nice.
Thx, pretty much as I expected. The same till around 2k RPM and then slightly more TQ. The big difference is the more gradual drop off after 4k RPM thus the added HP. You can actually feel it if you drive the 2 different engines a lot.
Mikestang
08-03-2006, 06:24 PM
These are measured at the enigine directly, not a chassis dynometer. The most accurate way to determine what the engine gives you. With chasis dynos it is virtually impossible to get accurate readings for the low end.
Ahh, gotcha, engine dyno.
bulldog
08-03-2006, 06:50 PM
I just though it would be interesting for folks to see. Both engines have very good, low to mid range torque curves. What you need in a truck. Even the V6 has 220 lb-ft just over 1000 RPM.
Vegas Runner
08-03-2006, 10:25 PM
That is very interesting. It is always hard to find torque curves. Where did you find these?
bulldog
08-03-2006, 10:28 PM
I got the ones I posted from Toyota literature. Collected over time. The V8 was fromthe initial 4R launch material, while the V6 from the FJC launch m,aterial. The VVTi V8 I dunno.
Bluto
08-04-2006, 08:51 AM
The VVTi V8 I dunno.
I have a couple of "TOYOTA TUNDRA — NEW FEATURES" pdfs. Got them on the internet somewhere.
bulldog
06-06-2007, 01:15 AM
Just to add to the conversation.
Here are the Toyota specs for the 03-04 V8, 05 V8 and 03-05 V6. Also added is the appendix with the updated numbers due to new SAE standards from 06+.
Note in the appendix the altenator output, which translates to basically a 130A altenator for all models (checked older versions as well).
Hope you guys enjoy the info.
AlexJet
06-06-2007, 07:53 AM
Thanks Andries. Useful information.
Teotwaki
06-06-2007, 09:43 AM
Just to add to the conversation.
Here are the Toyota specs for the 03-04 V8, 05 V8 and 03-05 V6. Also added is the appendix with the updated numbers due to new SAE standards from 06+.
Note in the appendix the altenator output, which translates to basically a 130A altenator for all models (checked older versions as well).
Hope you guys enjoy the info.
Ooooh..... 130 Amps? That is kick butt. No need to ever upgrade. The stock alternator in my big old Bronco is 90 AMPs max.
bulldog
06-06-2007, 11:19 AM
Ooooh..... 130 Amps? That is kick butt. No need to ever upgrade. The stock alternator in my big old Bronco is 90 AMPs max.
They state 1560 Watts for the altenator, so at 12V it is 130A. If they use 13.8V for the rating it is 113A and 14.8V it is 105A, none of these make a lot of sense. Teh Altenator fuse is 140A anyway. So I would say it is safe to bet 120-130A for the stock altenator.
Teotwaki
06-07-2007, 10:26 AM
They state 1560 Watts for the altenator, so at 12V it is 130A. If they use 13.8V for the rating it is 113A and 14.8V it is 105A, none of these make a lot of sense. Teh Altenator fuse is 140A anyway. So I would say it is safe to bet 120-130A for the stock altenator.
Agreed! I had exactly the same train of thought.
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.